Idaho Music - Message Board

what's up with it?

RE: Q for Jeff: silence at end of | from partypickleMay 31 2004 - 19:11

hey! You guys like wienies?
I got a weiner party happenin now dudes!
You wanna come?
Free quick death for the first to arrive.
can't say better than that dudes.

RE: Q for Jeff: silence at end of | from Billy RosewoodMay 27 2004 - 15:48

Hey Mr. Dinet, are you related to Axel Foley?

RE: Q for Jeff: silence at end of | from Axel DinetMay 27 2004 - 09:55

No, no Codreanu... it's definitely not a DSM-IV thing. I would say it's a classic example of the F8/%G.HH712* principle, under the R!$77g//g//itr9 quadrant operative's structural guidelines.

RE: Q for Jeff: silence at end of | from Pantsy McDoodlesMay 26 2004 - 22:12

my guess is the latter.

:)

RE: Q for Jeff: silence at end of | from CodreanuMay 26 2004 - 18:32

Wow...a true psychiatric novelty! Shortly after assuming anothers identity, the adopted persona splinters into distinct personalities all related by either phonetic equivalancies and/or minor varients in spelling -all capable of interacting contrarily, vis-a-vis one to another, in apparent succession- limited only by the subjects apparent incapacity to spawn further linguistic analogues. That's one for the books.....the DSM-IV that is.

Either that or he's just a big, dumb, fat, obnoxious wienie!!!

RE: Q for Jeff: silence at end of | from Alex NiedtMay 26 2004 - 15:18

Imposter! I'm the real douchebag.

RE: Q for Jeff: silence at end of | from Alex NeatMay 26 2004 - 12:41

Idaho sucks.

RE: Q for Jeff: silence at end of | from Alex NeetMay 26 2004 - 12:40

Look at me. I'm Alex. I love Idaho. Isn't that great?

RE: Q for Jeff: silence at end of | from Alex NiedtMay 26 2004 - 12:38

Do I know you?

RE: Q for Jeff: silence at end of | from Alex NiedtMay 26 2004 - 12:03

Yeah, no shit. What a fuckin' faggot. I seriously hate that guy so much. I've never met a bigger douche in my life. Someone, please kill him.

RE: Q for Jeff: silence at end of | from well, duh!May 25 2004 - 23:53

You don't think we know that?

RE: Q for Jeff: silence at end of | from Alan Meat May 25 2004 - 21:03

just so u know, I am a muthafuckin douchebag.

RE: Q for Jeff: silence at end of | from Alex NiedtMay 24 2004 - 13:52

"it gives the listener a moment to kind of bask in the afterglow of the most (arguably) beautiful idaho song ever. it's peaceful. and it keeps the moment from being prematurely thrust into full audio of another song, if one's disc-player is on repeat or shuffle or whatever."

That's how I've always thought of it. It's a very good idea.

RE: Q for Jeff: silence at end of | from AndrewMay 24 2004 - 12:43

It's not an hour long. It's forty-something minutes. ; )

RE: Q for Jeff: silence at end of | from jeffMay 24 2004 - 08:00

i think its just to get the record to be 1 hour long? shit, i really dont remember...i like the silence too for some reason

what's up with it? | from _m²May 23 2004 - 14:26

hey jeff, i have for a long time been curious about something (and i'm sorry if this has been covered elsewhere on the board...)

but at the end of the song 'levitate,' there is almost exactly one minute of silence. empty. the song fade ends at about 4:23 but the track continues on until 5:24.

so is there a story behind this? it may be personal, or trivial, or of a technical nature, or just none of our damn business. but i was just curious if that minute of emptiness was there intentionally, and if so, why.

i actually kind of like it. it gives the listener a moment to kind of bask in the afterglow of the most (arguably) beautiful idaho song ever. it's peaceful. and it keeps the moment from being prematurely thrust into full audio of another song, if one's disc-player is on repeat or shuffle or whatever.

okay. sorry for bein' nosey. just curious.
thanks in advance.